
Premises liability laws in San Diego and throughout California hold property owners responsible for maintaining safe conditions on their premises. When they fail to do so, and someone gets hurt as a result, the injured party may be entitled to compensation.
At Hulburt Law Firm, we are dedicated to seeking justice for those harmed due to unsafe conditions. Below, we’ll break down premises liability laws, the responsibilities of property owners, and what you should do if you’ve been injured.
Premises liability is a legal concept that holds property owners, landlords, and businesses accountable when their negligence causes harm to visitors. These cases can arise from various hazardous conditions, including:
If a property owner fails to address these dangers or warn visitors about them, they may be held legally responsible for injuries that occur as a result.

Under California Civil Code section 1714, property owners have a legal duty to keep their premises in a reasonably safe condition.
Everyone is responsible, not only for the result of his or her willful acts, but also for any injury occasioned to another by his or her want of ordinary care or skill in the management of his or her property or person. - California Civil Code section 1714(a).
This applies to:
Under section 1714, landowners owe a duty to exercise ordinary care in managing their property in light of the foreseeability of injury to others. (Rowland v. Christian (1968) 69 Cal.2d 108, 119.)
In the past, a landowner’s responsibility depended on the type of visitor, including invitees, licensees, and trespassers:
Today, premises liability is not based on the type of visitor, but rather, ordinary principles of negligence under section 1714. (Hoffmann v. Young (2022) 13 Cal.5th 1257, 1267.) “The owner of premises is under a duty to exercise ordinary care in the management of such premises in order to avoid exposing persons to an unreasonable risk of harm. A failure to fulfill this duty is negligence.” (Brooks v. Eugene Burger Management Corp. (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 1611, 1619.)
To hold a property owner accountable, you must prove the following elements:
(Judicial Council of California Jury Instruction 1000.)
California follows a pure comparative negligence system, which means that even if you were partially at fault for your injury, you can still recover damages — your award is simply reduced by your percentage of responsibility. (Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 804.)
In premises liability cases, property owners frequently argue that the injured visitor shares blame. Common defenses include claiming the visitor was distracted by a phone, ignored posted warning signs, wore inappropriate footwear, or entered an area that was obviously hazardous. Under comparative fault, a jury assigns a percentage of responsibility to each party.
For example, if a jury finds that a grocery store was 70% at fault for failing to clean up a spill and the customer was 30% at fault for not watching where they walked, the customer’s damages award is reduced by 30%. On a $100,000 verdict, the customer would recover $70,000. Importantly, California’s pure comparative negligence rule means that even a visitor found 90% at fault can still recover 10% of their damages — unlike states that follow a modified system where any fault above 50% bars recovery entirely.
This is why working with an experienced premises liability attorney matters. A skilled attorney can counter comparative fault arguments by demonstrating that the property owner had superior knowledge of the hazard, that warning signs were inadequate, or that the dangerous condition was not reasonably discoverable by the visitor. Understanding how insurance coverage applies in these cases can also affect the strategy for maximizing your recovery.
If you suffer an injury due to unsafe conditions, take the following steps to protect your rights:
The statute of limitations for premises liability cases in California is generally two years from the date of injury. (California Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1.)
But there are exceptions that can shorten or extend the statute. For example, claims against a government entity, like a city, county, or publicly owned property, must be filed within 6 months of the injury. (California Government Code section 945.6(a)(1).)
Consult with an attorney to ensure your claim is timely filed and critical evidence is preserved.
.webp)
Premises liability cases can be complex, requiring strong evidence and skilled legal representation. At Hulburt Law Firm, our award-winning San Diego premises liability attorneys, Conor and Leslie Hulburt, have a proven track record of holding negligent property owners accountable.
Why Choose Us?
If you’ve been hurt on someone else’s property in San Diego, contact Hulburt Law Firm today for a free consultation. Call (619) 821-0500. The Truth Demands Justice.
Simply fill out the form or call 619.821.0500 to receive a free case review. We’ll evaluate what happened, your injuries, and potential defendants to determine how we can best help you.