Hulburt Law Firm's attorneys have recovered over $150 million for catastrophic injury and wrongful death victims across San Diego, including those harmed by unsafe property conditions. Premises liability law in California holds property owners to a duty of reasonable care under the foreseeability test set out in Rowland v. Christian, 69 Cal. 2d 108 (1968), and codified at Civil Code §1714(a).
When a property owner ignores a safety hazard and someone is hurt as a result, the law allows that victim to pursue full compensation for medical bills, lost income, pain and suffering, and long-term care. We have handled the most serious of these cases, from drownings to multi-level falls that left clients brain injured. If you or a family member has been injured on someone else's property in San Diego, we offer a free, confidential case review and never charge a fee unless we recover for you.
Injured in a San Diego premises or slip and fall accident? Get help today.

After a premises liability accident in San Diego, you may feel overwhelmed, anxious, and uncertain about how to move forward. Coping with serious injuries, mounting medical expenses, and insurance or liability disputes can create significant emotional and financial stress.
Hulburt Law Firm helps premises liability victims navigate this challenging process, providing compassionate guidance, protecting your rights, and pursuing maximum compensation for medical care, lost income, and long-term recovery.
Apartment complexes, condominium associations, and residential landlords owe a non-delegable duty to maintain common areas, stairs, lighting, and security features. Under California Civil Code §1714(a) and Becker v. IRM Corp., 38 Cal. 3d 454 (1985), landlords are responsible for foreseeable defects discoverable by reasonable inspection. Hulburt Law Firm pursues claims against negligent property managers and ownership entities when tenants and guests are injured by hidden hazards, broken walkways, defective handrails, or inadequate lighting.
Hazardous conditions involving stairways, balconies, decks, windows, and guardrails frequently cause catastrophic injury in San Diego apartment complexes, hotels, and multi-story commercial buildings. California Civil Code §1714(a) and Rowland v. Christian, 69 Cal. 2d 108 (1968) require property owners and landlords to identify and correct foreseeable structural hazards. Building code violations, deferred maintenance, and ignored tenant complaints often surface during our investigation. We work with structural engineers to document defects and pursue claims against property owners, management companies, and landlords whose negligence caused fall, crush, or collapse injuries.
Slip, trip, and fall accidents on commercial and private property are the most common premises liability claims in San Diego. Under California Civil Code §1714(a), every property owner owes a duty to maintain reasonably safe conditions for foreseeable visitors. When a wet floor goes unmarked, a curb is uneven, a doormat is improperly secured, or an aisle is cluttered, that duty is breached. Hulburt Law Firm investigates the maintenance records, sweep logs, and surveillance footage that prove what the owner knew and when. We hold negligent property owners accountable and pursue full compensation for fractures, head trauma, spinal injuries, and the long-term consequences that often follow.
Swimming pool drownings and near-drownings cause catastrophic anoxic brain injuries and wrongful death across San Diego County, often involving children. California Civil Code §3342.5 and Health and Safety Code §115920 et seq. impose strict pool fencing, gate, and safety requirements on property owners with pools. The attractive nuisance doctrine extends a heightened duty when children are foreseeably present, even as trespassers. Hulburt Law Firm provides compassionate legal support to families navigating long-term medical care after a pool incident and pursues full compensation from negligent homeowners, apartment landlords, hotels, and pool maintenance companies.
Injuries on city sidewalks, county parks, public school grounds, transit stations, and government buildings are governed by California Government Code §835, which permits recovery when a dangerous condition of public property causes injury. These claims carry a strict six-month administrative deadline under Government Code §911.2, dramatically shorter than the standard two-year personal injury limit. Hulburt Law Firm meets this deadline by filing a timely government tort claim, preserving the right to sue the City of San Diego, County of San Diego, Caltrans, or other public entities for injuries caused by neglected public property.
Property owners in San Diego have a duty to provide adequate security when foreseeable criminal activity puts visitors at risk. The California Supreme Court established the foreseeability test for negligent security in Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping Center, 6 Cal. 4th 666 (1993), requiring courts to weigh the burden of additional security against the foreseeability of the harm. Apartment complexes, hotels, parking structures, bars, and shopping centers in neighborhoods with documented prior crime cannot ignore that risk without legal consequence. Hulburt Law Firm pursues physical injury, emotional trauma, and financial losses suffered by victims of assaults, robberies, and shootings on negligently secured property.
California Civil Code §3342 imposes strict liability on dog owners for bite injuries, meaning the victim does not need to prove the owner knew the dog was dangerous. Landlords and apartment owners can also be liable for harboring known-dangerous animals on their property. Hulburt Law Firm recovers full compensation for medical expenses, lost income, scarring, and lasting psychological trauma in dog bite and animal attack cases. For a deeper analysis of the statute, see our resource on California's dog bite strict liability law.
Conor and Leslie Hulburt, founders of the Hulburt Law Firm, are dedicated San Diego premises liability lawyers with extensive experience helping clients recover maximum compensation after serious or catastrophic injuries. They understand the physical, emotional, and financial challenges victims face following premises liability accidents, and are committed to guiding clients through every step of the legal process.
Known for their genuine care, dedication, and strategic advocacy, Conor and Leslie have built a reputation as trusted personal injury attorneys in San Diego, providing top-tier representation for premises liability victims and ensuring justice is served.

Our experienced attorneys have a proven track record of achieving extraordinary results in premises liability cases.
Jury verdict against Caltrans for a 13-year-old boy who was hit by a car while using a dangerous crosswalk.
A sudden tire failure caused an SUV to fishtail and crash into a tree on the side of a San Diego County highway, killing a beloved husband and father.
A massive, improperly installed gate collapsed on a sub-contracted worker who was asked by the general contractor to paint it, causing his tragic death.
An apartment building owner in San Diego failed to maintain the second story guard railings, resulting in a woman falling through a railing and suffering a brain injury.
An apartment complex owner ignored the dangers of second-story window seats, resulting in a toddler falling out of a window and suffering a severe brain injury.
A family daycare center's failure to maintain a backyard fence resulted in a child tragically drowning in a pond on a neighboring property.
During your free case review, we listen to where and how the incident happened—whether it was at a store, apartment complex, hotel, parking lot, pool, or other property—and what injuries you’re dealing with. We review any photos, incident reports, emails, or insurance letters you already have and give an honest assessment of whether a premises liability claim may be available under California law. This conversation is confidential and there’s no obligation to move forward.
If you decide to work with us and the scope of representation is signed, we begin a focused investigation into the property and the hazard. That can include visiting and photographing the scene, obtaining incident and maintenance reports, requesting surveillance video, reviewing inspection logs, and speaking with witnesses, employees, or first responders. Acting early helps us preserve key evidence like spill logs, repair records, and security footage before it’s lost, altered, or overwritten.
When appropriate, we work with carefully selected experts to help analyze what happened and why. In premises cases, that may include building-code and safety experts, security experts in negligent-security cases, engineers, and medical professionals who can explain your injuries and future care needs. Their input helps us evaluate whether safety standards were followed and how the dangerous condition caused your injuries.
Using the facts and expert input, we analyze who had control over the property and what they knew or should have known about the unsafe condition. We look at how long the hazard existed, whether there were prior complaints or incidents, what inspections or repairs were (or weren’t) performed, and what reasonable steps could have reduced the risk. We identify all potentially liable parties, which may include owners, property managers, tenants, businesses, contractors, and, in some situations, public entities.
We work with you and your medical providers to understand the full impact of your injuries, including medical expenses, time away from work, limitations at home, and changes to your day-to-day life. We then develop a settlement strategy that presents both the liability evidence and your damages in a clear, organized way to the insurance companies and defense lawyers involved. Throughout negotiations, we handle communications, explain any offers in plain language, and help you weigh the risks and benefits of settlement versus litigation.
If a fair resolution cannot be reached through negotiation, we are prepared to file a lawsuit and take your case to court. Litigation can involve written discovery, depositions of property owners, managers, employees, and experts, and, when necessary, preparing for trial. At trial, we present photos, video, inspection records, expert testimony, and your story to show how the dangerous condition arose, why it violated safety standards, and what the incident has meant for you and your family.
Our investigation includes preserving surveillance footage, logs, and prior-incident reports, plus consulting structural engineers, security experts, and human-factors specialists to prove what the property owner knew or should have known.
We use drone photography and 3D laser scanning to reconstruct property conditions, and create demonstrative simulations to explain mechanism of injury to defense counsel, mediators, and juries.
Defense attorneys and insurance companies know us and respect us. We assess the full extent of your damages and pursue all responsible parties in order to maximize the compensation you deserve.
Conor Hulburt obtained a $28.1 million verdict in a dangerous condition case. Our team knows how to overcome property owner defenses, like open and obvious hazards, lack of constructive notice, and comparative fault.
We limit our caseload so we can give every premises liability client direct attention. From providing regular case updates to achieving life-changing results, we genuinely care about each and every one of our clients.
California premises liability law defines when property owners, managers, businesses, and public entities can be held responsible for injuries caused by unsafe conditions on their property. Here are some key principles that often apply in San Diego premises liability cases.
California Civil Code §1714(a) establishes the general rule that every person is responsible for injuries caused by their own want of ordinary care or skill in the management of their property. The scope of that duty was set out by the California Supreme Court in Rowland v. Christian, 69 Cal. 2d 108 (1968), which abolished the old common-law categories of trespasser, licensee, and invitee. Today, courts apply the eight Rowland factors to every premises liability case:
The result is a duty of reasonable care extended to all foreseeable visitors, including social guests, business invitees, and in many cases trespassers and children under the attractive nuisance doctrine. For more on this analysis, see our resource on the duty of care owed by San Diego property owners.
To recover compensation in a California premises liability claim, the plaintiff must prove four elements:
California's pattern jury instructions (CACI 1000-series) apply this framework in every case. Our resource on proving liability in premises liability cases walks through each element with examples drawn from actual San Diego incidents.
Liability extends to any person or entity with control over the dangerous condition at the time of injury. In California premises cases, that often includes:
Identifying every responsible party often unlocks additional insurance coverage. See our resource on insurance coverage for injuries on someone else's property for more on this analysis.
Property owners and their insurance carriers raise predictable defenses in San Diego premises cases:
Our team has defeated each of these defenses in catastrophic premises cases.
California premises liability victims can recover economic damages, non-economic damages, and in narrow cases, punitive damages.
For a full breakdown, see our resource on compensation available to premises liability victims in San Diego.
California enforces strict deadlines for filing a premises liability claim:
Missing the wrong deadline can permanently destroy an otherwise valid claim. The six-month government claim deadline traps the most victims. Our team files immediately upon retention. Our walkthrough of the legal process for premises liability claims in San Diego shows how these deadlines fit into the broader timeline.
Premises liability is the legal doctrine that holds property owners, landlords, and occupiers responsible for injuries caused by unsafe conditions on their property. Under California Civil Code §1714(a), every person owes a duty of reasonable care in the management of their property. The California Supreme Court in Rowland v. Christian, 69 Cal. 2d 108 (1968), expanded that duty to all foreseeable visitors. Premises liability covers slip-and-fall incidents, negligent security, pool drownings, dog bites, falling objects, defective handrails, and many other property-related injuries. For a full primer, see our resource on premises liability laws in San Diego.
Winning a California premises liability case comes down to three things: proving the property owner's duty was breached, documenting the resulting harm, and outworking the defense on evidence. The strongest cases combine fast scene investigation (preserving surveillance footage before it is overwritten), maintenance and sweep records that show what the owner knew, an expert (engineering, human factors, or security) who can explain how the hazard caused the injury, and detailed medical documentation tying the injury to the incident. The plaintiff also has to overcome the defenses described above: open and obvious, lack of constructive notice, and comparative fault. Our resource on the legal process for premises liability claims in San Diego walks through each stage.
The four elements of negligence in any California premises liability case are duty, breach, causation, and damages. Duty means the defendant controlled the property and owed reasonable care under Civil Code §1714(a). Breach means the defendant failed to maintain the property safely or failed to warn of a known hazard. Causation means the breach was a substantial factor in producing the injury. Damages means the plaintiff suffered measurable harm. California's pattern jury instructions (CACI 1000-series) apply this framework in every premises liability trial. Our resource on negligence in premises liability cases explains how each element plays out in practice.
Soft-tissue injuries, mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI / concussion), chronic pain syndromes, and exacerbation of pre-existing conditions are the hardest to prove. They often do not show up on standard imaging like X-rays or routine MRIs, and insurance defense doctors aggressively challenge whether the injury was caused by the incident at all. Winning these cases requires the right diagnostic workup (neuropsychological testing for brain injury, EMG for nerve damage, advanced imaging like DTI for concussion), treating physicians willing to testify, and a clear timeline showing the change in function before and after the incident. Our resource on common injuries in premises liability cases covers the spectrum of premises-related injuries we see.
Everything is discoverable in litigation, and the worst surprises come from things clients did not tell their lawyer. Disclose, even if you think it might hurt your case: prior injuries to the same body part, prior personal injury claims or workers' compensation claims, pre-existing medical conditions, prior arrests or convictions, current social media posts or photos that could be taken out of context, and any communication you have already had with the property owner or insurance company. Attorney-client privilege protects what you tell your lawyer. Concealing information from your own attorney almost always backfires when the defense finds it in discovery.
If the floor was wet, the spill had been on the ground long enough that the store should have discovered it, or the store created the hazard (a leaking refrigerator, a recently mopped floor without warning signs, a buffer machine in use), you likely have a case. The hinge is constructive notice: how long was the spill there, and did the store have a reasonable inspection and cleaning protocol. We obtain sweep logs, employee schedules, and surveillance footage to prove constructive notice. National retailers (Costco, Target, Walmart, Vons, Ralphs, CVS, Walgreens) typically have well-documented protocols that we can use against them when they were not followed.
We also explain how liability insurance coverage for injuries on someone else's property typically responds in these cases.
A warning sign is not a complete defense. The question is whether the warning was adequate given the hazard. A small wet-floor sign placed far from a slippery aisle, or a sign warning of a hazard that the property owner had a duty to actually fix rather than just warn about, does not necessarily protect the owner. Even if you knew about the hazard, California's comparative fault rule under Civil Code §1431.2 allows recovery reduced by your share of fault. We see substantial recoveries even when the plaintiff bore some responsibility.
Different rules also apply when children are involved, since they may not appreciate visible dangers. See our explainer on the attractive nuisance doctrine in California.
California has moved away from the strict "open and obvious" bar. Courts now treat the obviousness of a hazard as one factor for the jury to weigh under the Rowland duty analysis, not as an automatic defense. If the property owner should have anticipated that visitors would encounter the hazard despite its obviousness, the duty still applies. An obvious icy patch on the only path to the apartment door, or an obvious broken stair on the only route to a parking lot, can still support liability.
We cover the bigger picture in our resource on when property owners fail to keep you safe.
Yes. California follows pure comparative fault under Civil Code §1431.2 (Proposition 51). The jury assigns a percentage of fault to each party, and your recovery is reduced by your share. Unlike many states, California permits recovery even if the plaintiff is 99% at fault, recovering the remaining 1%. Defense lawyers reliably argue comparative fault, so we prepare the case from day one to minimize the percentage assigned to the plaintiff.
For example, if your total damages are valued at $100,000 and you’re found 30% at fault for not paying attention, your recovery could be reduced to $70,000. Insurance companies may try to assign an unfair share of blame to you, so careful investigation and advocacy can be important to ensure responsibility is assessed fairly.
To see how comparative negligence sits inside the broader framework, read our overview of California premises liability laws.
In most cases, your own health insurance pays your medical bills while the case proceeds, subject to a lien for reimbursement at settlement. Some homeowner's, business, or commercial policies include MedPay coverage that pays a limited amount (typically $1,000 to $10,000) regardless of fault. If you have no health insurance, we may arrange treatment on a lien basis with treating physicians who agree to be paid out of the settlement. We coordinate liens, MedPay, and health insurance reimbursement so the maximum amount stays in the client's pocket at the end of the case.
Our resource on what premises liability victims in San Diego can recover walks through how medical bills factor into the final settlement or verdict.
Claims involving public property—such as city sidewalks and roads, county buildings, public parks, or state facilities—are subject to additional rules under California’s Government Claims Act. Under California Government Code §911.2, you must:
If the claim is rejected, there are additional time limits—often as short as six months from the rejection—to sue. Because these deadlines are shorter and more technical than the general two-year rule, prompt action is especially important in cases involving public property.
Government Code §835 governs liability for dangerous conditions of public property, requiring proof that the public entity had actual or constructive notice of the condition.
Our step-by-step legal process for premises liability claims shows where the government claim sits in the overall sequence.
In many premises liability cases involving personal injuries, the general statute of limitations is two years from the date of the injury, under California Code of Civil Procedure §335.1.
However, there are important exceptions:
Because missing a deadline can completely bar a claim, it’s generally wise to speak with a lawyer as soon as reasonably possible after an incident to identify and protect the applicable time limits.
To see how a premises liability claim moves through the legal process, read our full walkthrough.
To get the most out of an initial consultation, it’s helpful—but not mandatory—to bring:
If you don’t have all of this, you can still talk with a lawyer. Part of their role is to help gather the necessary records and information. Our resource on the role of premises liability attorneys in California explains what to expect from that first conversation forward.
There is no one-size-fits-all timeline. The length of a premises case can depend on:
Some cases resolve in several months once medical treatment and liability are reasonably understood. Others—especially those involving serious injuries, disputed liability, public entities, or complex code issues—can take a year or more and may require preparing for trial. A lawyer can give you a more specific sense of timing after learning the details of your situation.
Case value depends on the severity of the injury, the strength of liability, the medical specials (past and future), the wage loss, the pain-and-suffering multiplier appropriate to the harm, and the limits of available insurance. Minor slip-and-fall cases with full recovery and modest medical bills typically settle in five figures. Cases involving surgery, sustained disability, or permanent impairment commonly settle in mid-to-high six figures. Catastrophic premises cases (severe brain injury, drowning anoxic injury, fatal incidents) can reach seven and eight figures, particularly where punitive damages are in play under Civil Code §3294. Our $150 million-plus track record includes substantial premises liability outcomes. We give clients a realistic case-value range after we have reviewed the medical records and the available insurance. For more, see our resource on compensation for premises liability victims in San Diego.
You’re not required to hire an attorney, but premises liability cases can be complex. They often involve questions about building codes, inspection and maintenance practices, prior complaints, video evidence, comparative fault, and, in public-entity cases, strict government-claim deadlines. A premises liability attorney can investigate the incident, preserve evidence, consult with experts, handle negotiations, and guide you through litigation if needed.
Hulburt Law Firm handles premises liability cases on a contingency-fee basis. There is no out-of-pocket cost to you, no hourly billing, and no fee unless we recover compensation for you. Our fee is a percentage of the settlement or verdict, agreed in writing before we start. Case costs (expert witnesses, court filing fees, deposition costs) are typically advanced by the firm and reimbursed from the recovery. For more on how contingency arrangements work, see our resource on contingency fees and costs of personal injury cases in San Diego.
Potential defendants who may be held liable for an unsafe condition include:
Property Owners
Property owners have a legal duty to maintain their premises in a reasonably safe condition. This duty applies to residential, commercial, and public properties. Owners may include individuals, corporations, landlords, tenants, or government entities.
Property Managers or Landlords
If the property is managed or leased by a property management company or landlord, they may share responsibility for maintaining safe conditions on the premises. Property managers may be held liable for negligent maintenance, failure to address hazards, or improper security measures.
Business Operators
Owners or operators of businesses, stores, restaurants, hotels, or other commercial establishments have a duty to ensure that their premises are safe for customers, employees, and other visitors. They may be held liable for hazards such as slippery floors, falling merchandise, or inadequate security.
Contractors and Subcontractors
In cases involving construction sites or ongoing renovations, contractors, subcontractors, or construction companies responsible for the work may be held liable for hazards related to their activities, such as exposed wiring, debris, or unsafe conditions.
Government Entities
If the accident occurs on public property or government-owned premises, such as parks, sidewalks, or government buildings, governmental entities may be held liable for maintaining safe conditions and addressing hazards that pose a risk to public safety.
Maintenance Companies
Property owners or managers may hire maintenance companies or contractors to perform routine upkeep, repairs, or cleaning services. If the maintenance company's negligence contributes to unsafe conditions or fails to address hazards adequately, they may be held liable.
Security Companies
Property owners or businesses may contract security companies to provide surveillance, security personnel, or other security measures. If inadequate security contributes to criminal activities or injuries on the premises, the security company may be held liable for negligence.
Third Parties
In some cases, third parties unrelated to the property ownership or management may also be held liable for contributing to unsafe conditions. For example, a delivery company that negligently leaves a package in a walkway could be liable if someone trips over it and gets injured.
The Hulburt Law Firm’s team conducts a thorough investigation to identify all potentially responsible parties and assess their respective roles in creating or allowing the unsafe condition to exist. We can help you navigate the legal process and hold the appropriate parties accountable.
Yes. California Code of Civil Procedure §377.60 allows surviving spouses, registered domestic partners, children, and certain other statutory heirs to bring a wrongful death claim when a premises accident is fatal. Recoverable damages include the financial support the deceased would have provided, the value of household services, loss of love, companionship, and moral support, and funeral expenses. Fatal pool drownings, fatal falls from balconies or stairs, and fatal negligent-security incidents are the most common fatal premises cases we handle. For more, see our resources on wrongful death laws in San Diego and the statute of limitations for wrongful death claims.
Some common injuries sustained in premises liability cases include:
Head and Brain Injuries
Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) can occur if a person’s head strikes a hard surface during a fall or another accident. Head injuries can range from concussions to more severe brain damage, leading to long-term consequences.
Back and Spinal Cord Injuries
Falls, accidents involving defective stairs or ramps, or other incidents on unsafe premises can cause back injuries, spinal cord damage, herniated discs, or paralysis. These injuries have significant and lasting effects on mobility and quality of life.
Fractures and Broken Bones
Slip and fall accidents, trips, or other incidents caused by hazardous conditions can lead to fractures and broken bones. These injuries often occur in the wrists, arms, ankles, hips, or legs.
Internal Injuries
Blunt force trauma from a fall or impact can cause internal injuries such as organ damage, internal bleeding, or abdominal injuries. These injuries may not always be immediately apparent and may require prompt medical evaluation.
Emotional Distress
In addition to physical injuries, premises liability accidents can also result in emotional distress, including anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), or other psychological conditions.
Wrongful Death
In the most severe cases, premises liability accidents can result in fatalities. If a loved one dies due to injuries sustained on another person’s property, surviving family members may have grounds for a wrongful death claim to seek compensation for their loss.
The Hulburt Law Firm’s personal injury attorneys have helped clients suffering from these injuries achieve maximum compensation.
Some common causes of unsafe conditions in premises liability cases include:
Negligent Maintenance
Neglecting routine maintenance tasks such as repairing broken handrails, replacing worn-out flooring, fixing malfunctioning equipment, or addressing structural defects can create hazardous conditions on the property.
Lack of Handrails or Guardrails
Absence or inadequate installation of handrails or guardrails on staircases, balconies, ramps, or elevated platforms can contribute to falls and serious injuries. Property owners must provide appropriate safety barriers to prevent accidents.
Inadequate Warning Signs or Barriers
Failure to provide adequate warning signs, barriers, or cautionary markings to alert visitors to potential hazards can contribute to accidents and injuries on the property.
Construction or Renovation Hazards
Construction sites or properties undergoing renovations may have hazardous conditions such as exposed wiring, unfinished surfaces, or debris.
Uneven or Defective Surfaces
Uneven flooring, cracked pavement, potholes, or loose tiles can pose tripping hazards, leading to trips and falls. Property owners have a duty to maintain safe walking surfaces and repair any defects that could cause accidents.
Slippery Surfaces
Wet or slippery floors due to spills, leaks, or inadequate cleaning are a leading cause of slip and fall accidents in premises liability cases. Failure to promptly address these hazards or provide warning signs can result in injuries.
Inadequate Lighting
Poor lighting in stairwells, parking lots, walkways, or other areas can increase the risk of accidents, especially during nighttime or low-visibility conditions. Proper illumination is essential to prevent slips, trips, and falls.
Defective or Inadequate Security
Inadequate security measures such as broken locks, malfunctioning surveillance cameras, or insufficient security personnel can expose visitors to the risk of criminal activities such as assaults, robberies, or vandalism.
Dangerous Animals
Failure to control aggressive or unrestrained animals on the property can result in dog bites, animal attacks, or other injuries to visitors. Property owners must take reasonable precautions to prevent harm caused by dangerous animals.
Our Hulburt Law Firm team has experience with all of these causes of unsafe conditions.
Negligent security is a sub-type of premises liability that holds property owners responsible when a third-party criminal assault was foreseeable and the owner failed to take reasonable security precautions. The leading California case is Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping Center, 6 Cal. 4th 666 (1993), which set out a sliding-scale foreseeability test. Foreseeability is established by prior criminal incidents on or near the property, the nature of the business (bars, late-night convenience stores, hotels), the neighborhood's known crime profile, and complaints from tenants or patrons. We pursue negligent security cases against apartment complexes, hotels, bars, parking structures, retail stores, and shopping centers throughout San Diego County.
Hulburt Law Firm proudly serves premises liability victims throughout San Diego County, providing experienced legal guidance, compassionate support, and aggressive advocacy to help clients recover maximum compensation for injuries, medical expenses, lost wages, and long-term impacts.

Simply fill out the form or call 619.821.0500 to receive a free case review. We’ll evaluate what happened, your injuries, and potential defendants to determine how we can best help you.