Dangerous roadways and unsafe crosswalks in San Diego—including poorly maintained streets, potholes, missing signage, and obstructed pedestrian paths—can lead to serious accidents and catastrophic injuries. At Hulburt Law Firm, our experienced San Diego dangerous roadway lawyers help victims hold municipalities, property owners, and negligent drivers accountable while pursuing maximum compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and long-term recovery.
Whether the accident involves a car, truck, motorcycle, bicycle, or pedestrian, our team provides dedicated legal guidance to ensure your rights are protected and justice is served.
Injured as a result of a dangerous roadway in San Diego? Get help today.

After a serious crash, the police report may focus on the drivers, pedestrians, cyclists, or motorcyclists involved. But in many cases, the roadway itself also matters. An unsafe intersection, poorly controlled crosswalk, missing warning sign, obstructed sight line, defective shoulder, or dangerous construction zone can make a crash more likely.
Hulburt Law Firm investigates serious injury and wrongful death cases involving dangerous roadway conditions throughout San Diego County. These cases may involve cities, counties, Caltrans, contractors, private property owners, negligent drivers, or multiple responsible parties. We look at the road design, maintenance history, prior crashes, public complaints, traffic-control devices, visibility, and other evidence to determine whether the roadway contributed to the harm.
Some intersections and crosswalks are dangerous because of their design, location, traffic speed, visibility, or lack of adequate traffic control. These cases may involve high-speed crossings, confusing right-of-way, inadequate signals, missing pedestrian protections, poor maintenance, or a history of prior crashes or complaints.
Unsafe construction zones or improperly maintained work areas in San Diego can lead to serious accidents, including collisions with vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists. Hulburt Law Firm helps victims pursue compensation from contractors, municipalities, or other responsible parties for medical expenses, lost income, and long-term care.
Potholes, broken pavement, uneven asphalt, loose gravel, debris, failed repairs, and deteriorated shoulders can create serious hazards for drivers, motorcyclists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. These cases often require evidence of how long the defect existed, whether prior complaints or crashes occurred, and whether the responsible public entity or contractor had a reasonable opportunity to repair the condition or warn road users.
Dangerous roadway design can make a crash more likely or make the injuries far worse. These cases may involve unsafe curves, confusing lane transitions, inadequate shoulders, steep embankments, missing or defective guardrails, poor drainage, unsafe median openings, or abrupt pavement edge drop-offs. They often require engineering analysis, design plans, collision history, maintenance records, and careful evaluation of public-entity defenses such as design immunity.
Missing, confusing, obscured, or poorly placed signs and signals can make intersections, crosswalks, and roadways unreasonably dangerous. These cases may involve inadequate warning signs, unsafe signal timing, malfunctioning traffic lights, faded lane markings, blocked sight lines, poor lighting, or vegetation, poles, walls, parked vehicles, or other obstructions that prevent road users from seeing and reacting in time.
Dangerous roadway cases often involve shared responsibility. A driver may have been speeding, distracted, impaired, or careless; while an unsafe roadway condition made the crash more likely or made the injuries worse. In those cases, a proper investigation should consider all responsible parties, including public entities, contractors, property owners, and negligent drivers.
Claims involving dangerous roads, intersections, and crosswalks are defended aggressively. Public entities will dispute notice, causation, responsibility, and the role the roadway played in the crash. They will raise government immunities that do not apply in ordinary injury cases. Winning these cases requires focused investigation, expert analysis, and the ability to explain roadway hazards clearly to a jury.
Conor Hulburt has handled catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases against government entities, major corporations, insurance companies, and national defense firms. In Quiroz v. Caltrans, Conor was lead trial counsel and obtained a $28,163,528 jury verdict for a 13-year-old boy who was hit by a car while using a dangerous crosswalk.
At Hulburt Law Firm, Conor and Leslie Hulburt accept a limited number of serious cases so each one can receive direct attorney attention, careful investigation, and a strategy tailored to the roadway condition, injuries, and responsible parties.

Our attorneys have a proven track record of achieving extraordinary results in dangerous roadway cases.
Jury verdict against Caltrans for a 13-year-old boy who was hit by a car while using a dangerous crosswalk.
A sudden tire failure caused an SUV to fishtail and crash into a tree on the side of a San Diego County highway, killing a beloved husband and father.
A massive, improperly installed gate collapsed on a subcontracted worker who was asked by the general contractor to paint it, causing his tragic death.
A concrete block wall wasn't properly supported and fell on a construction worker in El Cajon, killing him.
An event producer’s negligence led to a participant’s death in a vehicle collision.
A defective airplane engine ignition component caused a deadly crash in San Diego.
We start by listening to what happened and reviewing the information you already have, such as police reports, photographs, videos, witness information, medical records, insurance letters, or government claim documents. We evaluate whether a dangerous roadway condition may have contributed to the crash and whether any urgent deadlines may apply.
Dangerous roadway evidence can change quickly. Skid marks fade, potholes are repaired, vegetation is trimmed, signals are adjusted, and construction zones are removed. When appropriate, we work to preserve key evidence, inspect the scene, document the condition, identify witnesses, and send preservation letters before important proof disappears.
Many roadway cases require public records from cities, counties, Caltrans, transit agencies, contractors, or other entities. We may request design plans, maintenance records, inspection history, prior complaints, collision data, signal timing records, construction documents, and other materials that help show who was responsible and what they knew before the crash.
Dangerous roadway cases often require qualified experts, including traffic engineers, civil engineers, human factors experts, accident reconstructionists, visibility experts, or roadway design specialists. These experts help evaluate whether the condition was dangerous, how it contributed to the crash, and how the injury could have been prevented.
If a public entity may be responsible, California’s Government Claims Act may require a timely government claim before a lawsuit can be filed. We identify the applicable deadlines, prepare the claim when required, evaluate available insurance and other sources of recovery, and pursue the case through negotiation, litigation, or trial.
Some cases resolve through settlement once the evidence is developed. Others require litigation and trial, especially when public entities, contractors, or insurers dispute fault, notice, causation, damages, or government immunities. Hulburt Law Firm prepares serious roadway cases with the goal of proving the hazard clearly and presenting the full impact of the injury or loss.
California dangerous roadway cases often involve claims that a public entity created or allowed a “dangerous condition of public property” and failed to fix it or warn about it in time. These claims are governed by the Government Claims Act and related statutes and have stricter rules and deadlines than many other personal injury cases.
Under California Government Code section 835, a public entity can be liable for injuries caused by a dangerous condition of its property when certain requirements are met. A “dangerous condition” generally means a defect or condition that creates a substantial (not trivial) risk of injury when the property is used with due care in a reasonably foreseeable way.
In roadway cases, examples of conditions that may be alleged as “dangerous” include:
Whether something rises to the level of a “dangerous condition” is fact-specific and often requires expert analysis.
To recover against a public entity for a dangerous roadway condition under Government Code section 835, an injured person generally must prove the elements set out in California’s civil jury instruction for these cases, CACI No. 1100:
Two companion instructions fill in the detail a jury hears alongside CACI No. 1100: CACI No. 1102 defines what counts as a “dangerous condition,” and CACI No. 1103 explains the notice requirement. Knowing how a jury will be instructed shapes how we build a case from the start, developing the engineering analysis, maintenance and inspection records, and prior-crash history to satisfy each element a San Diego jury would be asked to decide.
In many cases, there may also be fault on the part of a driver or other party. California’s comparative negligence rules allow responsibility to be divided among multiple defendants (and sometimes the injured person), rather than all-or-nothing.
Public entities often raise design immunity as a defense in dangerous roadway cases. Under Government Code section 830.6, a public entity may be immune from liability for injuries caused by a plan or design of a roadway or other public improvement if it can prove that:
Design immunity is an affirmative defense, meaning the public entity has the burden to prove it. It is also not a blanket shield in every situation. Courts have recognized that design immunity may not apply—or may be lost—when conditions have significantly changed since the original design, when the entity has notice that a design has become dangerous, or when the issue is not the design itself but the failure to provide adequate warnings about a known hazard.
Evaluating whether design immunity applies in a particular case is highly fact-specific and often requires review of design plans, approval records, crash history, and expert testimony.
Yes. Many dangerous roadway cases involve shared fault between a public entity and one or more drivers. For example, a driver may be speeding or distracted, while a dangerous curve, unprotected drop-off, obstructed sight line, or unsafe crosswalk design turns a mistake into a catastrophic or fatal crash.
In those situations, California’s comparative negligence system allows a jury to assign percentages of fault to each responsible party—such as the driver, the public entity, and sometimes others (like contractors or property owners)—and any damages awarded are allocated accordingly. The fact that a driver made an error does not necessarily eliminate a claim against a public entity if the roadway condition also played a substantial role.
When a dangerous roadway or crosswalk is found to be a substantial factor in causing a crash, injured people and families may seek the same types of damages available in other California personal-injury and wrongful-death cases, including:
Economic damages
Non-economic damages
If a crash is fatal, surviving family members may bring wrongful death and related survival claims, which have their own rules about who may file and what can be recovered. In rare cases involving especially egregious conduct, punitive damages may be available against non-public-entity defendants (such as certain private contractors or drivers); punitive damages are generally not available against public entities under California law.
Dangerous roadway cases nearly always involve strict, additional deadlines beyond the usual personal-injury statute of limitations because they are governed by the California Government Claims Act.
In many cases involving personal injury, wrongful death, or damage to personal property caused by a dangerous public roadway:
These claim deadlines work in addition to the general statutes of limitations that apply in California civil cases (such as the two-year limit for many personal-injury claims and the three-year limit for many property-damage claims). Missing the government-claim deadline can, in many situations, completely bar a dangerous roadway claim against a public entity, even if the normal two-year limitations period has not yet expired.
Because these rules are technical and unforgiving, it is important to talk with an attorney as soon as reasonably possible if you believe a dangerous roadway, intersection, or crosswalk contributed to a crash in or around San Diego County.
Forget surface-level research and mediocre inquiries. We dive deep to conduct extensive investigations and gather evidence in order to build your strongest case.
We use technology to your advantage. By using video and photography, scene recreations, and graphics, we tell your story in a visually-compelling way that other law firms cannot match.
Defense attorneys and insurance companies know us and respect us. We assess the full extent of your damages and pursue all responsible parties in order to maximize the compensation you deserve.
Catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases are rarely simple. We have taken on the largest corporations, insurance companies, and defense firms in the country and won.
We don’t just talk the talk, we walk the walk. From providing regular case updates to achieving life-changing results, we genuinely care about each and every one of our clients.
In California, public entities are generally immune from liability for injuries resulting from dangerous conditions on public property. However, there are certain exceptions and defenses available to public entities in dangerous condition of public property lawsuits. These immunity defenses are outlined in the California Government Code and include:
Design Immunity (Government Code Section 830.6)
Public entities are immune from liability for injuries caused by dangerous conditions on public property if the design of the property was approved in advance by the responsible public entity or official and was based on discretionary decisions made with substantial evidence at the time of approval.
Natural Conditions (Government Code Section 831.2)
Public entities are immune from liability for injuries resulting from natural conditions of unimproved public property, such as undeveloped land or wilderness areas, unless the condition created a substantial risk of injury.
Recreational Use Immunity (Government Code Section 831.4)
Public entities are immune from liability for injuries resulting from dangerous conditions on public property intended or maintained for recreational use, such as parks, trails, or playgrounds, unless the injury was caused by a known dangerous condition for which no warning was provided.
Trail Immunity (Government Code Section 831.7)
Trail immunity specifically applies to public trails and provides immunity from liability for injuries resulting from dangerous conditions on the trail unless the condition was caused by a known dangerous condition for which no warning was provided, or the injury resulted from willful or malicious conduct.
A roadway, intersection, or crosswalk may be considered “dangerous” under California law when it creates a substantial, not trivial, risk of injury to people using it with reasonable care in a foreseeable way. That can include design issues, visibility problems, missing or confusing signs, or unsafe features that turn a driver’s mistake into a catastrophic crash.
Examples include poorly designed or marked intersections, unprotected high-speed crosswalks, obstructed sight lines, missing guardrails where vehicles can drop off steep embankments, abrupt pavement edges, unsafe shoulders, and confusing or inadequately controlled construction zones. Whether something qualifies as a “dangerous condition of public property” is fact-specific and often requires expert analysis.
Sometimes it’s obvious that another driver did something wrong—but a closer look shows the road itself made the situation much more dangerous than it needed to be. Signs that a dangerous roadway may have played a role include:
If you suspect something about the roadway felt unsafe before the crash—or others have complained about the same spot—it’s worth having a dangerous roadway attorney evaluate whether the road itself may be partly to blame.
In many cases, yes. California law allows injured people and families to bring claims against public entities, including cities, counties, and state agencies such as Caltrans, when a dangerous condition of public property is a substantial factor in causing a crash. These cases are governed by the Government Claims Act and have additional requirements and shorter deadlines than typical injury claims.
To succeed, you generally must show that a dangerous condition existed, that it created a foreseeable risk of the type of harm that occurred, that the public entity either created the condition or knew (or should have known) about it in time to fix or warn about it, and that the condition was a substantial factor in causing the injuries. An attorney experienced with dangerous roadway cases can help evaluate whether these elements may be met in your situation.
It depends on which government owns and maintains that stretch of road. In and around San Diego, responsibility is usually split among several public entities: Caltrans maintains state highways and freeways, the County of San Diego maintains many roads in unincorporated areas, and each city (San Diego, Chula Vista, Oceanside, and the others) maintains the local streets within its limits. Private contractors and developers can also be responsible when a work zone or a newly built road is involved.
Identifying the right entity matters for two reasons: it determines who you bring a claim against, and it controls which deadlines apply. Claims against public entities are governed by the California Government Claims Act and generally require a written government claim within six months of the incident, far shorter than the usual personal injury deadline. Part of our early investigation is pinning down exactly which agency was responsible for the road, the signage, or the work zone, including hazards like potholes and poor pavement maintenance, so the correct claim is filed on time.
If you suspect the roadway, intersection, or crosswalk contributed to the crash, it’s important to:
Because dangerous roadway cases often involve public-entity claims with strict deadlines, it’s wise to talk with a lawyer as soon as reasonably possible so that key evidence can be preserved and required notices can be filed on time.
Common dangerous roadway issues include:
A thorough investigation by engineers and accident reconstructionists is often needed to determine whether these conditions meet California’s definition of a dangerous condition of public property.
There is no single timeline. Dangerous roadway cases are often more complex and take longer than a typical two-car collision because they involve:
Some cases can resolve within a year or two once liability and damages are fully developed. Others—especially those involving catastrophic injuries, disputed liability, or complex design-immunity issues—can take longer and may require going all the way to trial. A lawyer familiar with these cases can give you a more specific sense of timing after learning the details of your situation.
You are not required to hire an attorney, but dangerous roadway cases are among the most complex personal-injury matters. They involve public-entity procedures, engineering and human-factors evidence, design-immunity defenses, and strict claim deadlines that are easy to miss if you’re not familiar with them.
Many firms, including Hulburt Law Firm, handle these cases on a contingency fee basis. That typically means:
Case costs (such as court filing fees, expert costs, and records charges) are often advanced by the firm and reimbursed from any settlement or verdict, as explained in the written fee agreement.
Hulburt Law Firm proudly serves dangerous roadway victims throughout San Diego County, providing experienced legal guidance, compassionate support, and aggressive advocacy to help clients recover maximum compensation for injuries, medical expenses, lost wages, and long-term impacts.

Simply fill out the form or call 619.821.0500 to receive a free case review. We’ll evaluate what happened, your injuries, and potential defendants to determine how we can best help you.