A defective vehicle or component can cause a crash, or make the injuries from a collision far more severe. Faulty brakes, tires, airbags, seatbacks, restraint systems, steering components, and other automotive defects can lead to catastrophic injuries, permanent disability, or death.
Hulburt Law Firm represents people and families after serious injuries and deaths caused or worsened by defective cars, trucks, motorcycles, and vehicle components. We investigate the defect, preserve key evidence, and identify the manufacturers, suppliers, dealerships, repair facilities, and other parties that may be responsible.
Injured as a result of an auto defect? Get help today.

Auto defects can cause a crash, prevent a vehicle from responding safely, or make the resulting injuries far more severe. The type of defect often determines which evidence must be preserved, which experts are needed, and which manufacturers, suppliers, dealerships, or repair facilities may be responsible.
Hulburt Law Firm handles serious auto defect cases involving unsafe tires, brakes, airbags, seatbacks, restraint systems, steering components, fuel systems, vehicle structures, and other defective automotive products.
Defective brakes, steering components, or electronic stability systems can prevent a driver from slowing, maintaining control, or responding safely to an emergency. A failure may involve faulty design, defective parts, software errors, poor manufacturing, or improper installation or repair.
Important evidence may include the vehicle itself, electronic data, warning lights, repair history, recall information, failed components, maintenance records, and expert testing. Depending on what caused the failure, responsibility may extend to the vehicle manufacturer, component supplier, dealership, repair facility, or another company involved in the vehicle’s design or maintenance.
Tire blowouts, tread separations, and other sudden tire failures can cause a driver to lose control without warning. These failures may result from defective design or manufacturing, inadequate bonding, aging, improper storage, poor maintenance, or a failure to warn about known risks.
Important evidence may include the tire and vehicle, date codes, tread and belt condition, maintenance and replacement history, recall information, prior complaints, crash-scene evidence, and expert inspection. Depending on the facts, responsibility may extend to the tire manufacturer, vehicle manufacturer, distributor, retailer, dealership, or service facility.
Airbags, seatbelts, pretensioners, and other restraint systems are designed to protect occupants during a crash. When they fail to deploy, deploy too late or with excessive force, unlatch, tear, or otherwise perform improperly, they can cause or worsen serious injuries.
Important evidence may include the vehicle and restraint components, electronic data, diagnostic codes, photographs, recall information, repair history, crash dynamics, and expert testing. Depending on what failed, responsibility may extend to the vehicle manufacturer, airbag or restraint supplier, dealership, or repair facility.
Seatbacks and head restraints are designed to support occupants and limit movement during a collision. When a seatback collapses, recliner mechanism fails, or head restraint breaks or is poorly designed, an occupant may be thrown backward or into another part of the vehicle, causing serious brain, neck, spinal cord, or paralysis injuries.
Important evidence may include the vehicle and seat components, seat position, electronic data, photographs, crash dynamics, design and testing records, prior similar failures, and expert inspection. Responsibility may extend to the vehicle manufacturer, seat or component supplier, dealership, or repair facility.
Fuel tanks, fuel lines, batteries, electrical systems, and other vehicle components should be designed to reduce the risk of fire after a foreseeable collision. When those systems rupture, leak, short circuit, or fail to isolate an ignition source, an otherwise survivable crash can result in catastrophic burns or death.
Important evidence may include the vehicle and fire-damaged components, fuel-system design, battery data, crash damage, fire patterns, recall information, prior incidents, and expert inspection. Depending on what failed, responsibility may extend to the vehicle manufacturer, component supplier, dealership, repair facility, or another company involved in the vehicle’s design or maintenance.
A vehicle’s roof, pillars, doors, windows, and restraint systems should protect occupants during a foreseeable rollover. When the roof collapses, doors open, windows fail to contain occupants, or seatbelts and airbags do not perform properly, a survivable crash can cause catastrophic brain, spinal cord, or fatal injuries.
Important evidence may include the vehicle and roof structure, crush patterns, restraint-system performance, electronic data, photographs, crash dynamics, design and testing records, and prior similar incidents. Responsibility may extend to the vehicle manufacturer, component suppliers, or others involved in designing or producing the vehicle’s occupant-protection systems.
Autonomous driving and advanced driver-assistance systems can create serious risks when they fail to detect vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists, roadway hazards, or changing traffic conditions. Defects may involve automatic emergency braking, lane-keeping assistance, adaptive cruise control, steering systems, sensors, cameras, radar, software, or warnings about when the driver must take control.
Important evidence may include electronic vehicle data, software versions, system alerts, sensor and camera information, repair history, recall notices, prior complaints, and expert testing. Responsibility may extend to the vehicle manufacturer, software developer, component supplier, dealership, repair facility, or another company involved in designing or maintaining the system.
Auto defect cases require careful preservation of the vehicle, qualified engineering analysis, and the ability to obtain and explain technical evidence controlled by manufacturers and suppliers. Conor and Leslie Hulburt bring substantial experience handling catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases involving defective vehicles and components.
Conor has taken on Ford, Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Continental Tires, and other major manufacturers in automotive product liability cases. His experience includes a $25.36 million recovery involving a sudden tire failure, a $5 million recovery involving a collapsed passenger seatback, and significant recoveries involving defective head restraints, driveshafts, and other vehicle components.
Leslie brings extensive experience in arbitrations, mediations, trials, and appeals. Her background in journalism and education helps her identify the critical facts, organize complex engineering and corporate records, and explain technical evidence clearly and persuasively.

Our experienced attorneys have a proven track record of achieving extraordinary results in automotive defect cases.
A sudden tire failure caused an SUV to fishtail and crash into a tree on the side of a San Diego County highway, killing a beloved husband and father.
A passenger seatback collapsed in a rear-end collision, causing the occupant life-changing spinal injuries and paralysis.
The driver's head restraint broke off when he was rear-ended at high speed on the 15 freeway, causing the driver to suffer a spinal cord injury and paralysis.
During your free case review, we listen to what happened, what injuries you are facing, and why you believe a vehicle or component may have failed. We review any available photographs, police reports, repair records, recall information, medical records, and insurance communications and give you an honest assessment of the case.
Preserving the vehicle is the first priority. The vehicle and failed components should not be repaired, altered, sold for salvage, or destroyed before they are properly documented and inspected. We may also preserve electronic vehicle data, tires, airbags, seatbelts, seats, damaged parts, maintenance records, photographs, video, and other crash evidence.
Qualified engineers and other experts may inspect the vehicle, analyze the crash, test failed components, and evaluate whether the vehicle was reasonably safe. Depending on the case, the investigation may address tire failure, braking or steering performance, restraint systems, roof strength, post-crash fire, electronic systems, or whether a safer practical design was available.
Auto defect cases may involve the vehicle manufacturer, component suppliers, dealerships, distributors, repair facilities, or others connected to the vehicle’s design, manufacture, sale, or maintenance. We identify all potentially responsible parties and available insurance coverage and determine whether driver negligence, roadway conditions, or another cause also contributed to the crash or injuries.
Once the technical evidence and damages are sufficiently developed, we present what failed, why the defect mattered, and how the crash affected the client’s health, work, family, and future. We handle communications with manufacturers, insurers, and defense lawyers, challenge efforts to blame the driver or minimize the injuries, and keep the client informed about settlement offers and options.
If the responsible companies and insurers are unwilling to resolve the case fairly, we are prepared to file a lawsuit. Litigation may involve vehicle inspections, expert testing, corporate records, written discovery, depositions, motions, mediation, and trial preparation. At trial, we use testimony, physical evidence, engineering analysis, electronic data, and visual presentations to explain what failed, why the vehicle was not reasonably safe, and how the defect caused or worsened the injuries.
California auto defect cases are generally governed by product liability law. A claim may involve a design defect, manufacturing defect, or inadequate warning about a known or foreseeable risk. The overview below explains the principal legal issues that may arise in a serious automotive defect case.
California law may hold manufacturers, distributors, and sellers strictly liable when a defective vehicle or component causes injury. Under a strict-liability theory, the injured person generally does not have to prove that the defendant acted carelessly. The focus is instead on whether the product had a design defect, manufacturing defect, or inadequate warning when it left the defendant’s possession or control, and whether that defect was a substantial factor in causing the harm.
Strict liability does not make a manufacturer or seller automatically responsible whenever someone is injured in a vehicle. The injured person must still prove that the product was defective, that it was used in an intended or reasonably foreseeable way, and that the defect caused or worsened the injuries.
Responsibility may extend through the vehicle’s chain of distribution, including the automaker, tire or component manufacturer, distributor, and dealership or retailer that sold the defective product. This is especially important in auto defect cases because the company that designed or manufactured the failed component may be different from the automaker whose name appears on the vehicle—and may be located outside the United States.
An automotive defect does not have to cause the collision for a manufacturer or supplier to be responsible. A vehicle should be designed to provide reasonable protection during foreseeable crashes.
A defective seatback, roof, airbag, seatbelt, fuel system, door latch, window, or head restraint may turn an otherwise survivable collision into one involving catastrophic injury or death. These are often called crashworthiness or enhanced-injury cases.
The investigation focuses on how the vehicle and its safety systems performed, which injuries resulted from the original collision, and which injuries were caused or made worse by the defect. Important evidence may include the preserved vehicle, crash dynamics, occupant movement, electronic data, component testing, medical evidence, and safer alternative designs.
Vehicles and safety components sold in the United States must comply with applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. Those standards establish minimum performance requirements for areas such as brakes, tires, restraints, roof strength, lighting, and crash protection.
Compliance with a federal standard does not necessarily mean that a vehicle was reasonably safe. A product may satisfy the minimum regulatory requirement and still have an unsafe design, particularly when a practical, safer alternative was available.
Federal records can also provide important evidence. Consumer complaints, NHTSA investigations, recalls, technical service bulletins, and manufacturer reports may help show when a company first learned about a recurring failure and how it responded.
A vehicle or component does not have to be recalled for an auto defect claim to succeed. Many dangerous conditions cause injuries before a recall is issued, and some defects are never formally recalled.
When a recall exists, its timing and scope may provide important evidence. Relevant questions include when the manufacturer first received similar complaints, how long it investigated the problem, whether the recall was issued before or after the crash, and whether the proposed repair actually corrected the danger.
A completed recall repair does not necessarily end the inquiry. The repair may have been performed incorrectly, the replacement part may have carried the same defect, or the recall may not have addressed the failure involved in the crash.
Vehicle owners can check for open recalls using the NHTSA recall lookup tool. The absence of an open recall, however, does not establish that a vehicle or component is free of defects.
The vehicle is often the most important evidence in an auto defect case. If it is repaired, altered, sold for salvage, or destroyed before a qualified inspection, the failed component and other critical evidence may be lost permanently.
When a defect may have caused or worsened the injuries, the vehicle, tires, seats, airbags, seatbelts, restraint hardware, electronic data, and any recovered debris should be preserved in their post-crash condition. Written preservation notices should be sent promptly to the insurer, tow yard, storage facility, salvage company, and anyone else who may control the vehicle.
Photographs and records are helpful, but they are rarely a substitute for inspecting the actual vehicle and components. Early preservation gives engineers and other experts the best opportunity to determine what failed and why.
California auto defect cases are subject to strict deadlines. In many personal injury cases, the general statute of limitations is two years from the date of injury. Wrongful death claims are also generally subject to a two-year deadline measured from the date of death.
Different rules may apply when the defect or its connection to the injury was not reasonably discoverable, when a minor is injured, or when a public entity may share responsibility. Determining the correct deadline requires careful review of the facts and claims involved.
Auto defect cases also have a practical evidence deadline that may run much faster than the legal one. Vehicles may be released to insurers, sold for salvage, repaired, altered, or destroyed within days or weeks. Early action can help preserve the vehicle, failed components, electronic data, maintenance records, photographs, and other evidence needed to determine what failed and why.
For more information, see our guide to the statute of limitations for a San Diego car accident claim.
We preserve and examine the vehicle, failed components, electronic data, repair history, recalls, and other evidence to understand what failed and why.
Auto defect cases often involve engineering, crash dynamics, electronic data, and complex timelines. We use technology and visual presentation to make that evidence clear.
Defense attorneys and insurance companies know us and respect us. We assess the full extent of your damages and pursue all responsible parties in order to maximize the compensation you deserve.
Our attorneys have taken on Ford, Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Continental Tires, and other major manufacturers in serious automotive product liability cases.
A serious auto defect injury can overwhelm a person. We keep clients informed, prepare carefully, and take the time to understand how the injury has affected their health, work, family, and future.
An auto defect is a problem with the design, manufacture, or warnings of a vehicle or component that makes it unreasonably dangerous when used in an intended or reasonably foreseeable way.
Examples may include brakes that fail during normal use, tires prone to tread separation, airbags or seatbelts that do not perform properly, collapsing seatbacks, unsafe fuel systems, weak roof structures, or defective driver-assistance technology.
An auto defect may cause the collision itself or make the resulting injuries more severe.
You may have a claim if a defective vehicle or component caused the crash or made the resulting injuries more severe. Warning signs may include an unexpected tire failure, brake or steering malfunction, airbag or seatbelt failure, collapsed seatback, post-crash fire, roof crush, or safety system that did not perform as expected.
The defect may not be obvious from the police report or visible damage alone. Auto defect cases often require preservation of the vehicle, inspection by qualified engineers, review of electronic data and repair records, and investigation into recalls, prior complaints, similar failures, and safer alternative designs.
Do not allow the vehicle to be repaired, altered, sold for salvage, or destroyed before it has been properly documented and inspected. The vehicle and failed components are often the most important evidence in an auto defect case.
Notify the insurer, tow yard, storage facility, and anyone else controlling the vehicle in writing that it must be preserved. If possible, photograph the vehicle from all sides, including close-up images of visible failures, damaged components, tires, seats, airbags, and restraint systems.
An attorney can send formal preservation notices, arrange secure storage, and coordinate expert inspections. Once the vehicle or a critical component is gone, proving what failed may become much more difficult.
Important evidence may include the vehicle and failed components, photographs and video, police reports, medical records, maintenance and repair history, electronic vehicle data, recall information, and witness statements.
Depending on the alleged defect, the case may also require engineering inspections, crash reconstruction, product testing, manufacturer documents, technical service bulletins, prior complaints, and evidence of similar failures. Preserving the vehicle before it is repaired, altered, sold for salvage, or destroyed is often the most important first step.
Often, yes. An auto defect does not have to cause the collision itself. Another driver may cause the impact, while a defective airbag, seatbelt, seatback, roof, fuel system, or other component causes or worsens the resulting injuries.
California allows responsibility to be divided among multiple parties. A case may therefore involve both the negligent driver and the manufacturers, suppliers, dealerships, or other companies responsible for the defective vehicle or component.
The investigation should separate two questions: who caused the collision, and whether the vehicle provided reasonable protection during the crash.
A recall can be important evidence that a vehicle or component presented a safety risk, but failing to receive or act on a recall notice does not automatically defeat a claim.
The timing and scope of the recall may matter, including when the manufacturer first learned of similar failures, whether the recall addressed the same defect, and whether the proposed repair actually corrected the danger.
The absence of a recall does not mean there was no defect. Many dangerous conditions cause injuries before a recall is issued, and some are never formally recalled.
Certain surviving family members may have a wrongful death claim when a defective vehicle or component caused a fatal crash or made an otherwise survivable collision deadly.
A wrongful death claim may seek compensation for the loss of financial support, household services, love, companionship, care, and guidance, along with funeral and burial expenses. The estate may also have a separate survival claim for losses the person sustained before death.
Fatal auto defect cases require prompt investigation because the vehicle, failed components, electronic data, and other critical evidence may be repaired, altered, sold for salvage, or destroyed. Identifying and preserving that evidence can help determine what failed and which manufacturers, suppliers, dealerships, repair facilities, or other parties may be responsible.
The compensation available depends on the injuries, the long-term effects of the defect, and the responsible parties and insurance coverage involved.
Damages may include medical expenses, future treatment and care, lost income, reduced earning capacity, pain, physical limitations, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and other out-of-pocket losses.
When a defective vehicle or component causes permanent disability, catastrophic injury, or death, the claim should account for both the immediate losses and the future impact on the injured person and family.
California auto defect claims are subject to strict deadlines. In many personal injury and wrongful death cases, the general deadline is two years, although different rules may apply depending on when the defect and its connection to the injury were reasonably discoverable.
The practical deadline to preserve evidence may be much shorter. A vehicle can be repaired, sold for salvage, altered, or destroyed within days or weeks of a crash. Prompt action can help preserve the vehicle, failed components, electronic data, repair records, and other evidence needed to determine what failed.
Auto defect cases are handled on a contingency fee basis. That means there is no attorney fee unless we recover compensation for you.
The initial case review is free, and we explain the fee agreement and case expenses before you decide whether to move forward.
Hulburt Law Firm represents people and families after serious injuries and deaths caused or worsened by defective vehicles and automotive components across San Diego County, including San Diego, Chula Vista, National City, La Mesa, El Cajon, Santee, Poway, Escondido, Oceanside, Carlsbad, Encinitas, and surrounding communities.

Simply fill out the form or call 619.821.0500 to receive a free case review. We’ll evaluate what happened, your injuries, and potential defendants to determine how we can best help you.