Hulburt Law Firm represents people seriously injured in Waymo crashes throughout San Diego County, including riders, people in other vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists. When a vehicle is driving itself, understanding what happened can require examining the technology behind its decisions. We work to preserve the evidence, identify who is responsible, and pursue compensation that accounts for your medical needs and the ways your injuries have changed your life.
Talk with an attorney about your Waymo accident.

A Waymo crash may raise questions about what the vehicle detected, why it turned or stopped, and whether a person or an automated system was in control. Another driver’s actions or a dangerous road may also have contributed. As part of our San Diego car accident practice, we handle serious injury and wrongful death claims involving Waymo, including the situations below.
Passengers can suffer serious injuries in a collision even when they had no control over the trip. We investigate the conduct of Waymo and other motorists, identify potential insurance coverage, and review any rider terms that may affect how the claim proceeds.
A turn across traffic, an unsafe lane change, or a failure to yield can injure people in another vehicle. We compare the physical evidence and witness accounts with available vehicle records to determine what happened and who should answer for the harm.
People walking or cycling have little protection when a vehicle strikes them. We investigate visibility, right of way, and the vehicle’s response, drawing on our work in serious pedestrian and bicycle accident cases.
A Waymo that brakes abruptly or stops in a travel lane may contribute to a crash, even without contacting the injured person’s vehicle. We examine why it stopped, whether the response was reasonable under the circumstances, and how other drivers reacted.
A pickup or drop-off can put a rider beside moving traffic or in a cyclist’s path. We investigate the stopping location, vehicle movement, and conduct of everyone involved to determine whether an unsafe maneuver or another failure caused the injury.
We establish who was controlling the vehicle at the time of the crash. If an employee or another human driver was at the wheel, the investigation may involve that driver’s conduct, the employer’s responsibility, and any role the automated technology played.
After a fatal crash, families need answers about what happened and what comes next. We investigate the collision and evaluate potential wrongful death and estate claims, with attention to the family’s loss and the evidence needed to establish responsibility. Our article on the legal issues families face after a fatal crash explains both claims.
Conor and Leslie Hulburt founded Hulburt Law Firm to give serious injury and wrongful death cases the preparation and personal attention they require. We accept a limited number of cases so clients work directly with the attorneys responsible for their case.
Conor Hulburt has recovered more than $150 million for injured people and families in cases involving catastrophic injuries, dangerous roads, and defective products. His work includes claims against major vehicle manufacturers and government entities. Best Lawyers named him the 2027 San Diego Lawyer of the Year for plaintiffs’ product liability litigation, and he holds a Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent peer rating.
Leslie Hulburt brings extensive experience in litigation, arbitration, mediation, trials, and appeals. Her background in journalism and education informs her ability to investigate complicated facts and explain them clearly.
A Waymo claim may require both collision analysis and an examination of how a vehicle’s technology was designed and used. We bring our experience with serious crashes and defective products to that investigation, while keeping the focus on your recovery and the decisions you need to make.

Our attorneys’ prior vehicle collision and auto defect results include recoveries for people with life-changing injuries and families who lost a loved one.
Settlement for a client who suffered brain and spinal injuries in a collision on Interstate 5 in San Diego.
A passenger seatback collapsed in a rear-end collision, causing the occupant life-changing spinal injuries and paralysis.
Campus security was speeding and collided with a student’s vehicle, killing her.
We begin with what happened, the injuries you suffered, and the questions you need answered. A ride receipt, photographs, a police report number, or messages from Waymo can help. You do not need to know why the vehicle acted as it did before contacting us.
We seek preservation of relevant sensor data, camera recordings, trip information, and communications with remote support. We also look for witnesses and nearby video. A preservation demand puts the recipient on notice to retain evidence; obtaining the records may require formal discovery or other legal proceedings.
We compare available vehicle records with roadway evidence and witness accounts. When appropriate, accident reconstruction and engineering experts help evaluate what the vehicle detected, how it responded, and whether a different response could have prevented the injury.
We examine the treatment you have received, the care you may need, and the effect of your injuries on work and daily life. Medical specialists, life-care planners, and financial experts may help establish the long-term consequences of a serious injury.
We present the evidence supporting your claim and negotiate with the responsible parties and their insurers. Before you decide whether to accept an offer, we explain the payment, the rights you would release, and any unresolved questions about future care. The settlement decision remains yours.
If a fair resolution cannot be reached, we pursue the appropriate legal process. Depending on the parties and any enforceable agreement, that may involve a lawsuit or arbitration. We prepare the evidence for discovery, expert testimony, and a contested hearing or trial.
A driverless crash still requires proof of legal responsibility and the harm it caused. The investigation must establish how the vehicle was operating, what contributed to the collision, and which parties and insurance policies may respond. Without a human driver, the rideshare coverage rules explained on our Uber and Lyft accident pages are not the starting point.
Depending on the evidence, a claim may involve negligent operation or maintenance, a vehicle defect, another motorist’s conduct, or a dangerous roadway. Waymo’s involvement alone does not establish fault. We identify the conduct that caused the injury and the people or companies legally responsible for it.
If a defect in the vehicle or its automated driving system contributed, we evaluate potential auto defect claims. California’s product liability instructions address different theories of liability; the appropriate theory depends on the product, the alleged defect, and the evidence.
Vehicle Code section 38750(c)(1)(G) requires a mechanism to capture at least 30 seconds of autonomous technology sensor data before a collision while the vehicle is operating in autonomous mode, with the data preserved for three years. That record can help reconstruct the events leading to impact.
The requirement does not mean every useful recording is protected for three years or automatically available to an injured person. We seek preservation of additional vehicle and company records, as well as outside video that may be overwritten much sooner.
Waymo’s terms of service include an arbitration provision and state that the terms also apply to guests on another user’s ride. Whether an agreement requires arbitration of a particular injury claim depends on its terms, how it was accepted, and applicable law.
Being struck by a Waymo does not, by itself, mean you agreed to arbitrate. We review the injured person’s relationship with the service and any relevant agreements before deciding where to pursue the claim.
Under California’s comparative fault rule, an injured person’s compensation is generally reduced by their percentage of responsibility. A claim that you caused or contributed to the crash should be tested against the evidence. We examine the vehicle’s actions and the surrounding circumstances before accepting an insurer’s allocation of fault. Our article on how fault is determined after a San Diego crash explains the process.
A serious injury claim may include reasonable past and future medical expenses, lost income, reduced earning capacity, and necessary assistance at home. It may also include physical pain, emotional distress, disfigurement, and loss of enjoyment of life. California’s damages instructions address these categories of loss.
We document what your injuries mean in practical terms, including ongoing treatment, limitations at work, and activities you can no longer do. Future losses require supporting evidence, which is one reason a quick settlement may leave important needs unaddressed. Our guide to compensation after a San Diego car accident explains the main categories of damages.
California generally allows two years to bring a personal injury lawsuit under Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1. A claim against a public entity, such as one involving a dangerous public road, generally must first be presented within six months under Government Code section 911.2. Different rules and exceptions can apply, including in cases involving minors.
Reporting the collision to Waymo or speaking with an insurer does not substitute for meeting a legal deadline. Early review also helps protect evidence that may disappear well before the time to file expires. Our guide to car accident filing deadlines explains the main time limits.
We compare vehicle records, physical evidence, and witness accounts to build an independent explanation of the crash.
We use expert analysis, timelines, and visual presentations to make complex vehicle evidence understandable.
We investigate potential sources of recovery and document the future care, financial losses, and personal consequences of your injuries.
Our experience in serious collision and product liability cases informs how we prepare evidence for settlement discussions, arbitration, or trial.
You work directly with your attorneys and receive clear explanations of the decisions affecting your case.
Get to safety and call 911 if anyone is injured or emergency help is needed. Report the collision to police. If you can safely do so, photograph the vehicles, license plates, roadway, and injuries, and get witness contact information. Save your ride receipt and messages. Riders can also contact support through the app or in-car help controls. Seek medical attention and keep records of your treatment.
The absence of a human driver does not prevent an injury claim. Depending on what caused the crash, responsibility may rest with the company operating the vehicle, a manufacturer, another motorist, or more than one party. The vehicle’s involvement is the starting point for an investigation, not the answer to who was at fault.
You may have a claim against whoever caused your injuries, whether that was Waymo, another driver, or both. We review the crash evidence, available coverage, and any applicable rider agreement. Passengers should save their trip details even if someone else booked the ride.
Physical contact is not always necessary to establish responsibility. For example, an unsafe maneuver may cause another driver to take evasive action and crash. These cases require evidence connecting the maneuver to the injury. Witnesses, video, and the vehicle’s records may be especially important.
Relevant recordings and data may be obtainable through a request or formal legal proceedings. A preservation demand asks that evidence be retained, but does not itself require immediate disclosure. Access may involve disputes over relevance, privacy, or confidential business information. We identify the records needed and pursue the appropriate process to obtain them.
First understand what the payment covers and whether accepting it requires releasing any claims. Help with an immediate bill may leave future treatment, lost income, and other losses unresolved. Have any release reviewed before signing, especially if your doctors are still evaluating the lasting effects of your injuries.
It depends on whether an enforceable arbitration agreement covers your claim. Rider claims require a review of the applicable terms and the circumstances of acceptance. A pedestrian or another motorist does not become bound simply because a Waymo was involved in the collision.
Tell the attorney who booked the ride, who was riding, and the injured person’s age. Claims involving children may have different deadlines and settlement approval requirements. We also examine whether a rider agreement applies to someone who did not personally request the trip.
There is no reliable standard amount. The assessment depends on liability, the severity and duration of your injuries, your financial losses, and available sources of recovery. Understanding future treatment and the effect on your ability to work is essential before evaluating a settlement. Our overview of settlement versus trial explains how cases resolve.
The initial case review is free. We handle injury cases on a contingency fee basis, so there is no attorney’s fee unless we obtain a recovery. The written fee agreement explains the fee and how litigation expenses, including expert costs, are handled. Learn more about contingency fees and case costs.
Hulburt Law Firm helps people and families across San Diego County after serious Waymo accidents. From our San Diego office, we represent clients in downtown, the coastal communities, North County, East County, and the South Bay. We also assist visitors injured while traveling in the area.

If you or someone you love was seriously injured in a crash involving a Waymo, contact Hulburt Law Firm for a free case review. We will listen to what happened, explain which evidence needs attention, and discuss how we may be able to help.
Call 619.821.0500 or request a free case review.