Hulburt Law Firm represents people seriously injured in Tesla crashes throughout San Diego County, including drivers, passengers, motorcyclists, pedestrians, and cyclists. We investigate how the collision happened, whether a vehicle defect contributed, and who may be responsible. From preserving the car and its electronic records to documenting the care you will need, we prepare your case to pursue compensation that reflects the full effect of your injuries.
Talk with an attorney about your Tesla accident.

A Tesla crash may involve an inattentive driver, a failure of driver-assistance technology, or a vehicle defect that makes the injuries worse. Understanding which of those occurred requires evidence from the road, the vehicle, and the people involved. As part of our auto defect practice, we evaluate serious injury and wrongful death claims involving Tesla vehicles, including the following.
When a Tesla using Autopilot or Full Self-Driving runs a red light, enters the wrong lane, or fails to respond to traffic ahead, both driver conduct and vehicle performance require investigation. We examine whether a defect in the system, inadequate warnings, or insufficient driver-monitoring safeguards contributed to the crash.
A rider struck from behind may have little chance to avoid a serious injury. We investigate following distance, driver attention, and whether Autopilot or Full Self-Driving was engaged, then examine available evidence of the vehicle’s response. These cases draw on our work representing injured motorcyclists.
When a Tesla strikes a vehicle stopped at a light, in freeway traffic, or near an emergency scene, the investigation must explain why it failed to stop. We examine speed, visibility, braking, and driver conduct, along with any evidence that a driver-assistance feature contributed to the collision.
A person walking through a crosswalk or riding alongside traffic can suffer life-changing injuries when a driver fails to see or yield to them. We investigate right of way, sight lines, camera footage, and the Tesla’s movements to determine whether driver negligence, a vehicle defect, or both played a role.
Passengers may have claims against the Tesla driver, another motorist, or a manufacturer whose defective product contributed to their injuries. A Tesla owner who was driving may also have a product liability claim. We examine each potential source of responsibility, including whether a defect caused the crash or increased the harm.
A collision can become more dangerous if occupants cannot exit, a battery catches fire, or a seat or restraint fails to protect them. These cases require careful examination of the vehicle and the sequence of events after impact. We evaluate potential design, manufacturing, and warning defects even when no driver-assistance feature was in use.
After a fatal crash, the investigation may need to address both the collision and the vehicle’s ability to protect its occupants. We help families evaluate wrongful death claims and any separate claims belonging to the estate, while preserving the evidence needed to establish responsibility. Our article on the legal issues families face after a fatal crash explains both claims.
Conor and Leslie Hulburt founded Hulburt Law Firm to give serious injury and wrongful death cases the preparation and personal attention they require. The firm accepts a limited number of cases so clients work directly with the attorneys handling their claim.
Conor Hulburt has recovered more than $150 million for injured people and families. His experience includes serious vehicle collisions and defective products, including a $5 million recovery in a passenger seatback failure case. He holds a Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent peer rating, and Best Lawyers named him the 2027 San Diego Lawyer of the Year for plaintiffs’ product liability litigation.
Leslie Hulburt brings extensive litigation and trial experience, including work through discovery, mediation, trial, and appeal. She helps develop the facts, legal strategy, and presentation of complex cases.
In a Tesla case, that preparation means examining the driver’s conduct alongside the vehicle’s design and performance. We explain what the evidence supports, which claims warrant pursuing, and how each decision may affect your recovery.

Our attorneys’ prior results include recoveries for people with severe injuries and families who lost a loved one in vehicle collisions and auto defect cases.
Settlement for a client who suffered brain and spinal injuries in a collision on Interstate 5 in San Diego.
A passenger seatback collapsed in a rear-end collision, causing the occupant life-changing spinal injuries and paralysis.
Campus security was speeding and collided with a student’s vehicle, killing her.
We begin with what happened, the treatment you have received, and the questions you need answered. Photographs, a crash report number, and insurance information can help us evaluate the claim. You do not need to know whether Autopilot or Full Self-Driving was engaged before contacting us.
We seek preservation of the vehicle, relevant electronic records, and available video before repairs, salvage, or routine deletion make them harder to obtain. Requests may go to the vehicle owner, insurer, Tesla, and other evidence holders. Preservation is the first step; obtaining records may require consent or formal legal proceedings.
We compare physical evidence and witness accounts with available vehicle data. When appropriate, reconstruction and automotive engineering experts help determine how the collision occurred, whether a defect contributed, and whether a failure of occupant protection made the injuries worse.
We examine the treatment you have received, your expected recovery, and the ways your injuries affect work and daily life. Medical specialists, life-care planners, and financial experts may help establish future care needs, lost earning capacity, and the support you will require.
We present supported claims to the responsible parties and their insurers. Before you decide whether to accept an offer, we explain the proposed payment, unresolved losses, and the rights you would release. We also consider whether a settlement with one party could affect claims against others.
We prepare to file suit when necessary to protect deadlines, obtain evidence, or pursue a fair result. Litigation may involve depositions, engineering records, expert testimony, mediation, and trial. Settlement discussions can continue while the case moves forward.
Responsibility for a Tesla crash depends on what caused the collision and the injuries.
Full Self-Driving (Supervised), or FSD, can control steering, braking, lane changes, and turns, but it requires an attentive driver and can make dangerous errors. Federal safety regulators are investigating reports of Teslas with FSD engaged running red lights and entering opposing lanes, as well as crashes in reduced-visibility conditions involving glare and airborne dust. When the system fails to recognize a hazard or makes an unsafe maneuver, the driver may have little time to intervene before someone is seriously injured.
The driver’s duty to supervise does not eliminate Tesla’s potential responsibility. Under California law, Tesla may share liability if a defective design or inadequate warning contributed to the injuries. We examine how the system responded, whether its driver-monitoring safeguards were adequate, and whether its warnings clearly explained the relevant limitations. That investigation requires prompt efforts to preserve the vehicle, available electronic records, camera footage, and the software version in use when the crash occurred, before repairs, salvage, or updates alter important evidence.
Tesla may bear responsibility if a defect in the vehicle’s design or manufacture, or an inadequate warning, was a substantial factor in causing injury. California’s product liability rules can apply to people outside the Tesla as well as its occupants. The investigation must connect the alleged defect to the harm; a collision involving Autopilot or Full Self-Driving does not, by itself, prove a product was defective.
California’s civil jury instructions address design defects, manufacturing defects, and failures to warn. The applicable theory depends on the product, its use, and the evidence.
Electronic records may help establish speed, braking, system use, or other vehicle activity around a crash. Relevant evidence may be held in the vehicle, by Tesla, or in separate camera recordings. The information available varies by model, software, settings, and the event itself; no single record should be assumed to contain the complete answer.
We evaluate vehicle records alongside the scene evidence and witness accounts. Early preservation matters because a vehicle may be repaired or sold for salvage and recordings may be overwritten.
A serious injury claim may include reasonable past and future medical expenses, lost income, reduced earning capacity, and pain and suffering. For someone living with a brain injury, paralysis, or severe burns, future care and assistance can be a substantial part of the claim. We document those needs before evaluating whether an offer accounts for the lasting consequences of the injury.
Wrongful death claims involve different categories of loss, including financial support and companionship. Any separate estate claim requires its own analysis. Our guide to compensation after a San Diego car accident explains the main categories of damages.
A crash involving Tesla’s Robotaxi service or a Cybercab requires an investigation into how the particular vehicle was operating. We would examine who owned and operated it, whether a human driver was responsible for supervision, and whether vehicle technology or maintenance contributed to the harm. Potential claims may involve the operator, manufacturer, or other responsible parties.
The service name alone does not establish that a vehicle was operating without a driver or identify the proper defendant. The location, operating arrangements, and rules in effect on the crash date matter. Our Waymo accident page discusses related issues involving automated vehicle services.
California generally provides two years to file a personal injury lawsuit. Wrongful death claims also generally have a two-year deadline, although the starting date and exceptions require individual review. A claim involving a California public entity usually must first be presented within six months, and additional deadlines apply after the agency responds.
Different rules may apply depending on the claim and the person injured. The California Courts guide to filing deadlines explains why those details matter. Evidence can disappear well before the filing deadline, so early review is valuable even when a lawsuit is not immediately necessary. Our guide to car accident filing deadlines covers the main time limits.
We examine the driver’s account alongside vehicle records, physical evidence, and available video to build a supported explanation of the crash.
We use expert analysis, timelines, and visual evidence to make complex vehicle technology understandable.
We examine potential claims and available coverage alongside the long-term effects of the injury so important losses and sources of recovery receive attention.
Our experience in serious injury and product liability cases informs how we prepare evidence for settlement discussions and trial.
You work directly with your attorneys and receive clear explanations of the decisions affecting your case.
Get to safety, call 911 when emergency help is needed, and seek appropriate medical care. If you can do so safely, photograph the scene and vehicles, exchange information, and obtain witness contact details. Preserve any recordings already in your possession. If a vehicle defect may be involved, get advice promptly about preserving the car before it is repaired, transferred, or scrapped.
The driver must still supervise the vehicle and respond to road conditions. Tesla may also be responsible if a defect or inadequate warning contributed to the injuries. Other drivers or parties may share fault.
Yes, if a defect in the Tesla contributed to your injuries. Product liability claims are not limited to buyers or occupants. Motorcyclists, pedestrians, cyclists, and people in other vehicles may have claims against the manufacturer as well as a negligent driver.
The driver’s statements, vehicle records, and information held by Tesla may help answer that question. We seek preservation of relevant evidence and evaluate how it can lawfully be obtained. The records available depend on the vehicle and the circumstances; a police report alone may not resolve the issue.
Possibly. A defect may have contributed to the crash or made your injuries worse, even if your own conduct is also at issue. California’s comparative fault rules may reduce a recovery without eliminating it. We examine the driving evidence, system behavior, warnings, and the cause of your injuries.
Preserve the ride receipt, booking information, and any communications about the incident. The investigation needs to identify the operator, the vehicle’s operating mode, and any person responsible for supervision. Claims depend on those facts, the cause of the crash, and the law where it occurred.
An offer of policy limits deserves careful review, especially when your losses exceed that amount. We evaluate other potential claims and coverage, including a possible product liability claim, before advising on a release. The wording of a settlement can affect rights beyond the immediate payment. Our overview of settlement versus trial explains how those decisions are made.
The value depends on the severity of your injuries, future care, lost earnings, the effect on your life, and the evidence of responsibility. Available insurance and other sources of payment also matter. We assess those issues together rather than estimating a result from the vehicle brand or the fact that driver assistance was involved.
No. Most people do not have access to the technical records needed to evaluate a product claim. We can begin with the information you have and assess whether further investigation is warranted. You may also have a claim against a negligent driver regardless of whether a defect is established.
The initial case review is free. We handle injury cases on a contingency fee basis, so there is no attorney’s fee unless we obtain a recovery. The written agreement explains the fee and how case expenses, including expert costs, are handled. Learn more about contingency fees and case costs.
Hulburt Law Firm represents people injured in Tesla crashes throughout San Diego County, including San Diego, La Jolla, Chula Vista, El Cajon, Escondido, Carlsbad, and Oceanside. We handle cases arising on local streets and major routes such as Interstates 5, 8, 15, and 805.

If a Tesla crash has left you or someone you love seriously injured, contact Hulburt Law Firm for a free case review. We will listen to what happened, discuss the evidence that needs attention, and explain how we may be able to help.
Call 619.821.0500 or request a free case review.